26 June, 2007 - BBC Caribbean
By Tony Fraser
Tony Fraser attended the Washington Conference on the Caribbean
Making the most of the opportunities of
their Washington meeting is the challenge for Caribbean Community leaders.
The enthusiasm of Caricom leaders for verbal commitments
rather than hard agreements arrived at during their meetings in Washington with
US President George Bush and his Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice must now
be converted into substance if the view that this is a new beginning is to
become reality.
The commitments of the President are stated in the joint communiqué
to renew the Caribbean Basin Trade Promotion Act and the 1991 Trade and
Investment Framework Agreement and are necessary to make the 1983 Caribbean
Basin Initiative worthwhile.
Additionally, the joint communiqué, agreed to by both side,
commits support to Caricom’s intention to “expand the services sector, and
encourage a focus on the international financial services sector to facilitate
a competitive means of economic diversification”
The communiqué however doubles back to say that the commitment
also extends to maintenance of “appropriate regulatory and supervisory
practices, consistent with the highest international standards”.
Fork-tongued?
Making such statements to support the trade in services and
diversification of Caribbean economies while at the same time placing
protective barriers to its citizens participating in online gaming in Antigua
and refusing to budge even when the World Trade Organisation deems the barriers
to be in violation of fair trade rules.
Nevertheless, the communiqué commitments are vital to the
Caribbean if they are not to be disadvantaged by recent free trade agreements
the United States struck with the Central American group of countries.
As distinct from the existing upgraded CBI-type arrangements,
the CAFTA-United States free trade agreement extend to trade in services and
are of indefinite duration compared to CBI benefits which allow only for the
Caribbean to enjoy preferential treatment in goods and are for specified
period; having to be renegotiated after they expire.
As important as the presidential commitments are, similar
kinds of commitments received in Washington from the Ways and Means Committee
of the U.S. Congress, the body which holds the purse strings, and the grounding
of the Caricom leaders with the Black Caucus of the Congress - 40 black
congressmen, many of whom have West Indian backgrounds.
|
|
|
|
Caricom needs to find continued support within Congress |
The “sympathetic” ear and the possible voting support of these two bodies are
equally important if the trade negotiations and eventual legislative drafts are
to get through the Washington parliamentary system.
Future support
Moreover, long after President Bush departs the White House
in 18 months, it is the support of the Congressional bodies that will be critical
if Caricom leaders are to achieve the objectives they came here to receive from
the United States.
Another qualification that will have to be placed on the
achievement of the objectives of the Caribbean-United States conference is the
focus of the incoming president, whether Democrat or Republican - and this is
notwithstanding the belief that Democratic governments are more favourable to
Afro-America and the interest of regions such as the Caribbean than Republicans
are known to be.
This caveat is necessary to remind that it was under the
Clinton administration that the Caribbean banana industry got its heaviest
blows from the American banana companies operating out of Central America.
And it is with President Clinton, the dream President of
blacks in the U.S. and elsewhere, that Caribbean leaders had their last coming
together. Yet the leaders have all been commenting that little happened after
the Barbados meeting.
Long-term benefits
Therefore, two factors will come into the equation as to
whether the meeting will return long-term benefits to the Caribbean: what are
the interests of the United States in extending and upgrading the preferential
trade agreements with the Caribbean?
The second crucial factor would be the ability of Caricom to
exercise leverage through all possible openings to get support for the passage
of the new economic legislation.
In the first instance, the American interest is quite
definitely security of the homeland.
“We acknowledge the multidimensional nature of the security
threats and challenges faced by our countries and pledge to continue to work
together in the fight against terrorism, trafficking in persons, drugs and
small arms, and transnational crime,” states the communiqué.
|
|
|
|
The alleged plot to bomb fuel lines raised interest in
Caribbean activity |
Within the interests of the present administration with the threat to U.S.
territory in the wake of 9/11 and the most recent alleged terror plot on the
fuel lines to the JFK Airport is the possibility of the Caribbean making use of
the growing realization that Washington will come to understand and take
serious cognizance of the vulnerability of its southern border to infiltration
by those with a desire to bring harm to Americans and their civilization.
History has shown that concentrated attention on the Caribbean
and elsewhere in the world comes only when there is an American interest at
stake.
Which, after all, is the classic driving force of the foreign
policy of governments: self interest.
President F D Roosevelt, after the interventionist and
oppressive policies of U.S. governments in the Caribbean between the turn of
the 20th century and the post World War 11 period and the need for the United
States to initiate its economic empire, launched its 'good neighbour' policy to
Latin America and the Caribbean.
Again, in the very early 1960s when Fidel Castro’s
association with the Soviet Union posed a threat to American interests, going
in contradiction with the Munroe Doctrine and its updates denying the
opportunity to European countries to intervene in the hemisphere, President
Kennedy initiated the Alliance for Progress with the southern region of the
hemisphere.
CBI
The pattern of interest was repeated in the early 1980s when
Bishop began to take Grenada into the Cuban orbit, the result being the
Caribbean Basin Initiative.
Needless to say there are serious reservations as to the real
benefits that came to the Caribbean resulting from the above “new deals”. Not
seeking to achieve some benefit from the major trading partner of the Caribbean
would be reckless and stupid.
The second factor that could determine whether the leaders achieve
objectives: will they realize the importance of the Caribbean Diaspora in
America and be able to persuade the millions of people of Caribbean descent
mobilize themselves into a political force to influence decisions made in
Washington?
Caribbean
governments and people living in the region have to begin to conceive of the
Caribbean nation not simply as the people at home, but the extension of the
family everywhere in the world.
One of the most impressive showings in Washington was
the demonstration by our Caribbean relatives abroad of the love they have for
their place of origin.
Second and third generation West Indians in the Washington Carnival on
the weekend have the wine down to its fine points; they love Machel and Destra
and eat jerk chicken and pelau with the enthusiasm of anyone of us at home.
At the Diaspora conference, Caribbean nationals with two and three
university degrees and others well-positioned in the local government systems
mobilized themselves for the effort to support the Caribbean beyond the US$3
billion in remittances they send home every year.
Caricom has to learn how to utilize those resources.