CONTENTS:
The aim of this text is to create a framework within which the free exchange of ideas,perspectives and a national discourse on the development of policy for nation building can occur. The ideas put forward here are meant to articulate some specific recommendations of a concerned son of the soil,yours truly, who has heard enough political rhetoric which has done little to advance the process of nation building. Thus it is hoped that the suggestions made here will not serve as fodder for the political mill but rather as the basis for a blueprint for sustainable economic, social, cultural, and political reform and development.
The major areas of interest here are as follows:
For decades, particularly during the cold war, Dominica's foreign policy has been centred around articulating European or American made agendas, even when interacting with our regional partners. While it is true that our history of Colonial domination has left the region with the mother-country syndrome, with the shift of the geopolitics on the world stage, it is time that our foreign policy begin to articulate what may be referred to as the legitimate, home-grown aspirations of our people.
A case in point: Martinique and Guadeloupe
Dominica has failed miserably to fully embrace our neighbours in Martinique, and Guadeloupe in a manner becoming of our status as an independent nation. The fact that we have yet to establish trade, and investment missions in each of these islands is testimony to the way in which our policies, thus far, have seemed to reinforce the adversative colonial relations between these sister islands and Dominica, as dictated by the colonial powers.
Firstly, an effort should be made to bridge the language gap which still exists between our three islands. When one considers that just a half-hour's flight to the north and south of Dominica lies an affluent potential market of half a million people, we should be asking ourselves, "Why have our trading and diplomatic ties been so Eurocentric for so long?" Aren't we like the thirsty seamen who were sailing on a body of fresh water, the Amazon River, and not realizing this, were trying to catch rainwater with their sail? Why can we not look to our sister islands in this region for some of the answers to help us find relief from this socio-economic mess?
The question of whether we, as a nation, have done enough to develop the long historical and socio-economic ties, which have existed between us and other Caribbean nations, is crucial. Not only do we share a common history and language, but there is a bond based on the common aspirations of our people. The political and socio-economic isolationism, which has existed between Dominica, Martinique, and Guadeloupe should end. Cuba is another case in point; though the situation is more complex it is no less obvious.
The cementing and furthering of our regional ties beginning with Martinique and Guadeloupe for obvious reasons of geography, language, history, commerce, and culture may be pivotal in our ability to keep the doors to the European Market open. Considering the excellent shipping and airline connections, which these islands have with Europe, and North America, the potential for export market development is immeasurable. Also, Dominica stands to benefit tremendously from the industrial, infrastructural, technological, and socio-economic know-how, which both islands have to offer. We have not taken the implications of these concrete relations seriously in the past.
Serious consideration should be given to the establishment of a ferry link between Martinique, Dominica, and Guadeloupe. Such a service could be so structured that it would handle passenger vehicles, cargo vehicles, and a bus service. This could form part of a free-trade agreement between the three islands. The economic and cultural benefits of such a link may be one way out of our present economic crisis. This would also stimulate regional tourism.
Now that the cold war is over, Dominica should critically reconsider her geopolitical and foreign policy structures with a view to evaluate the extent to which they hinder or further the cause of nation building. The opportunities which now knock at our door are many in the socio-economic sphere; however, care must be taken to harmonize and depoliticize the ethos which shapes the approaches to trade and foreign policy, which any government adopts.
HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT - A Priority
Dominica's natural beauty is celebrated in song and dance but even more worthy of celebration is the beauty of her people. Dominicans are a most talented and resourceful people.
Our beloved nation cannot develop without the human resources so critical to nation building. The development of our human resources should be a major focus of any long term infrastructure development scheme. To this end, top priority has to be given to stopping and reversing the brain drain. This national cancer is a reality, which we will always have to live with; however the onus is on us to create opportunities in Dominica, which will convince our people that they can prosper here.
This is not an easy task however, some possible starting points are as follows:
USA cable television daily undermines Dominicans sense of ourselves as a nation. How does the old saying "know thyself" come true for us if the daily images with which we are bombarded on the screen are alien to us? How else does one explain the rise in crime, drugs, and the undermining of our values and cultural institutions?
On the Privatization of Public Utilities and the Enhancement of the Effectiveness of the Private and Public Sectors:
In recent years, the notion that government should divest itself of most, if not all, utilities has been put forward as the cure to our economic woes. Most often, this prescription has come from international lending agencies such as the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. Judging from the effects that such measures have had in other Third World countries, the extent to which this measure fosters national development is highly over rated. Whereas government may be able to put its fiscal house in order, on paper, using such measures; it has been noted that the wholesale transfer of publicly-owned operations, particularly utilities, into private hands can grossly undermine the control of the elected representatives of the people over the prices of essential goods and services. Latin America is a case in point.
The privatization of publicly owned operations should only be considered with the public interest in mind. To this end, there are some public sector establishments in which it is most vital, for the national good, that government retain the controlling shares eg. electricity, telephone, public works, water, sewage, road and highway operations, health, education, and basic essential food supplies. These can not be left to the whims and fancies of enterprises aimed solely at profit. This is not to say that these operations should not be made self financing, and thus not allow them to become a burden to the public finances. While it is important for efficient maagement principles to govern the operation of such public companies, priority should be given to ensuring that the public interest and the right to basic services and essential goods is preserved.
It may be true that privatization, when done on a measured basis allows for companies to be effectively operated, this may at times open the core of the economy to foreign ownership and thus undermine the nation's economic integrity. As much as is possible, the local public should be allowed to hold sixty percent of the shares in public operations. These corporations should be made more transparent in their public accountability. The individuals who pay the telephone, electricity, and water bills should all be allowed to buy shares in these public corporations, and be able to enjoy the profits.
Not only should the aim be to democratize this important sector of the economy but the nation's economic integrity should be preserved. The industrialized countries, like those of the G-8, who control the I.M.F., and who readily prescribe the wholesale privatization of public corporations to Third World governments, never use any of their own prescription. The pain to the poor, which is caused as a result of the I.M.F.'s austerity measures seems good only for Third World people. Industrialized nations never visit their people with such measures without providing the cushions of unemployment insurance and welfare to their people.
In the case of the public service, there is the need to depoliticize and professionalize appointments; this is crucial if this vital machinery of governments is to work efficiently. At the moment there is too much party political involvement in the business of appointments and the day to day functioning of the public service.
There is urgent need for the formulation and implementation of conflict of interest laws regarding parliamentarians, government ministers, senators, and senior public officials to protect against corruption in government. Senior public service appointments should be open to the scrutiny of parliament. This will go a long way in restoring confidence in these offices. At the same time, care should be taken to avoid the politicization of public service appointments.
Of major concern is the fact that to a large extent the critical eye of the media and press have been kept out of the day to day operations of government. This crisis is further compounded by the lack of diversity, and the almost total absence of a depth of independence and journalistic professionalism in the press and media. This should be viewed as a major threat to the democratic process in particular, and the national development in general. A conscious, and well informed public is the greatest asset to nation building, and the survival of our democratic traditions.
The right of citizens to critique and question the every thought, word, and deed of those in government is more important than having a government. The principle that, in our system of parliamentary democracy, governments are elected by a simple majority to govern on behalf of all citizens is pivotal to the proper operations of our democratic institutions. This makes all elected officials accountable to all citizens. It must be remembered that their allegiance, in taking the oath of office, is to the nation and her people at large, and that their salaries are paid from the public's purse. Laws on ethics in government should be formulated and implemented which would remind elected officials that they are responsible to God first, the nation second, and maybe later to their party.
In Dominica's political reality, a simple majority in parliament, coupled with the unbridled power of the prime ministership under the west ministerial system of parliamentary democracy often results in democratic dictatorship. Furthermore, the presidency is largely ceremonial, both in nature and function, with emergency powers which can only be invoked largely upon the advice of the prime minister. Serious consideration should be given to making the senate into a separate lower house, whose members shall be elected, and whose duty would be to review and fine tune legislation proposed and passed by parliament. This along with the above is necessary if our democratic institutions are to mature as Dominica "comes of age" as an independent nation.
In essence, the sole function of government is that of implementing the Will of the People, and as such, the structures of our democratic institutions should be so shaped as to make the achievement of this objective possible.
ON AGRICULTURE and FORESTRY
The history of agriculture in Dominica has shown that the only era in which there has existed any long term strategy for the development and exploitation of our agricultural and forestry resources has been that of the period of colonization. During that period, the focus of economic planning was on how the agricultural, human and forestry resources of this island, along with those of our sister islands, could benefit the economies of England, France and other European colonizing powers. It seems to be the case that our economic planning, even after fifteen years of political independence, has not emerged from the colonial ethos, which has dominated every aspect of our economic life for so long.
Consistently, it has been demonstrated by successive governments of all shades, that the absence of a home grown philosophy to govern economic planning has resulted in a reactionary methodology being used within government planning. This has been based largely on political ambitions from one five year term to the next. This has created a fragile economic base, the core of which is agriculture. When this is measured against the needs and aspirations of the Dominican people, it leaves much to be desired. How else does one explain the current banana crisis with which we are faced?
A policy on long term national strategy is needed for the proper management, development, and exploitation of our agricultural and forestry resources, beyond the twenty first century. The aim of such a policy should include:
ON TOURISM and HOTEL DEVELOPMENT
Given Dominica's central location in the Caribbean archipelago, her abundant natural beauty, and the warm hospitality of our people, the island is well placed to develop a viable tourism sector. Furthermore, the unique features of the island as captured in her nicknames: Nature Isle of the Caribbean, The Best Kept Secret of the Caribbean, etc.; these provide Dominica with the opportunity of developing a new product which can be marketed internationally with the increasing popularity of environmental and ecological issues internationally, this image of Dominica as an unspoiled part of the planet is a major trump card which can be used in marketing our tourism product.Indeed ,ecotourism is the ideal tourism product that we should vigorously protect, promote, and market at the local, regional ,and international levels.
Some specific institutions necessary for the development of a tourism industry would include:
The development and marketing of a tourism product which is "home grown", and appropriate to the culture and economic needs of the island should be carefully planned so as to avoid the social and cultural pitfalls which we have seen in other islands. The philosophy which informs the formulation of tourism development policy has not only to be based on economic considerations but more importantly, they should address, with a large measure of sensitivity ,the issue of social, cultural, and environmental impact which tourism does have on any country. Any development which is out of tune with the heart beat of a nation's culture, social fabric, or natural environment can bring with it very serious and often irreversible consequences.
Coupled with a national strategy and "home grown" philosophy for the development of the tourism and hotel industry is the very important factor of the infrastructural development which is a must if tourism in Dominica is to get off to a good start.
The large scale employment which such a project would create would be a major boost to the economy, not to mention the investment potential which it would generate. This is key to turning the economy around and the risks involved have proven to be well worth taking. We should not expect such a project to be handed to us on a silver platter however, capital should be raised locally, from private sources, and loan funds, as well as from friendly governments.
Foreign interests should be encouraged to participate in and take advantage of the many fertile opportunities which do exist within the hospitality industry. In so doing, it will be the duty of government to have the nation's best interest and that of her people at the heart of any development policy at all times. This requires a fluently articulated philosophy.
It often occurs that the fundamental question of national territorial, economic, social, and political integrity is sacrificed at the altar of political and economic opportunism. Investors should at all times be guided carefully and uncompromisingly on the fundamental questions which have serious implications for the future good of both their investment and the national interest.
The basic principles which govern the structure and function of Dominica's education system are antiquated. They form the cream of our legacy of slavery; and to that extent the system of education has functioned to undermine the social fabric and independence of our society by the creation of institutional barriers to eduction and training.
Education, particularly secondary and post secondary education in Dominica is still a privilege reserved for the chosen few and financially well off.
Education at all levels should be a basic human right, just as food or clothing. If we claim, as some of our high school mottos do, that the mind is as important as the body, how does one explain the fact that we as a nation have for generations robbed over eighty percent of our young people of a basic high school education, through the outdated Common Entrance Exam? There is absolutely no excuse for having such a guillotine around.
While one must acknowledge the fact that more recently, following the island's attainment of political independence, much progress has been made in the field of education, such as long distance learning, this does not negate the fact that:
The fact that more than twentytwo years after our attainment of independence, the political will has not yet been found to challenge the colonial and elitist ideology, which has informed and shaped our system of education, as well as many other social and economic structures in this nation, is cause for concern. Our education system is in dire need of emancipation from the archaic and colonial ethos, which strangles its development. The ability of the child to reach one's full physical, social, intellectual, spiritual, and psychological development should be the heartbeat of any credibly system of education:
High school education structured into the academic, vocational, and technical streams, should be made compulsory for every citizen.
The empty excuses, which have been used to keep the doors of high school education closed to so many for so long should be thrown off the cliffs of the Cabrits.
Our recent history has provided us with very vivid evidence indicating that it is of paramount importance that Dominica as a nation and the Caribbean as a region, have to be able to prevent and cope with natural disasters. The passing of Hurricane David in 1979, showed us that our economic infrastructure, and agricultural tourism, and other industries stand to suffer major damage if left unprotected from the elements or if left uninsured. The magnitude of such damage can be so enormous as to have the ability to undermine the prospects for economic prosperity in the long term.
A major disaster prevention and management policy should be put in place which would focus the attention of government on putting in place of the means by which the island's people, its economy, and social infrastructure shall be prepared to survive and return, as quickly as possible, to normality following the occurrence of any natural or man-made disaster.
In conjunction with national, regional, and international government, and non-government agencies, a disaster fund, and food bank should be established. This fund should be aimed at the restoration of the economic and social infrastructure following any disaster. The banking sector should be encouraged to play a major part in this project. Its role should also be to provide storm victims, farmers, etc., with a grace period on repayments or view of the economic slow down which may follow the occurrence of a major disaster such as a hurricane.
The crop insurance scheme which was established following the occurren0ce of hurricane David was a very important first step. This should be expanded to cover other crops such as coconuts, citrus, and other tree crops; also the fisheries, and tourism industries. Other sectors of the economy should be required by law to have all businesses fully insured. The aim of such a program should be to provide reasonable insurance coverage which would guarantee speedy recovery and, as a result, would also promote confidence in the stability of the economy.
In the area of housing in particular, and the construction industry in general a strictly enforcead code should be formulated regarding:
Of particular concern should be the environmental impact of: Pesticides, fertilizers, and herbicides used in farming, and the toxic, chemical, emissions, from our factories, power plants, and other industrial and domestic sites. Also, there is the need to measure the environmental impact of infrastructural projects. Some cases in point for an immediate environmental assessment study are: the emissions from the citrus processing plant located next to the Dominica Grammar School. The liquid chemicals discharged into the river and sea by the Dominica Coconut Products plant and the chemicals discharged from the agricultural experimental station at Londonderry.
It is also important that any future developmental project be preceded by an indepth environmental, social, and economic impact study. The point to be noted is that considerations of economic or social gains should not take precedence over environmental concerns.
In order that the national development process be democratized, broad and open public discussions and consultations should precede the setting up of any project. An approach to policy formulation which is broadly based, open, and consultative has many benefits. Not only does it generate much education and public participation but it also guarantees Community support and confidence in government in general and the nation building process in particular.
Finally, the bottom line should always be democratic nation building. Democracy, that is government by, of, and for the people, should not only apply to our political institution but also to every aspect of the economic, social, cultural, and education life of the nation. Though this process is time consuming, and requires much political will on the part of any government, it is the most bedrock upon which the future prosperity of this nation must be built.
1. Barth, Fredrik, Scale and Social Organization, Universitesforlaget, Oslo, 1978.
2. Bradby, Barbara, The Destination of the Natural Economy -Economy and Society, 1975.
3. Burawoy, Michael, The Politics of Production - Factory Regimes Under Capitalism and Socialism, Verso Editions, London, 1984.
4. Dalton, George, How Exactly are Peasants Exploited?, American Anthropologist.
5. Firth, Raymond, Elements of Social Organization, Becon Press, Boston, 1961.
6. Foucoult, Michel, The Archeology of Knowledge, Harper Torchbooks, New York, 1972.
7. Frank, Andre Gunder,Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America, Monthly Review Press, New York, 1967.
8. Trouillot, Michel-Rolph, Peasants and Capital - Dominica in the World Economy, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London, 1988.
Aurelius Gordon
PO Box 2103
Roseau,
Commonwealth of Dominica
Eastern Caribbean.
Email: auregordon@hotmail.com

| would welcome | ![]() |
your mail. |
